As always, creators can still appeal a video that was taken down, but YouTube warns this process will also be delayed because of the reduction in human moderation. YouTube says it largely won’t issue strikes - which can lead to a ban - for content that gets taken down by AI (with the exception of videos it has a “high confidence” are against its policies). Other content won’t be promoted or show up in search and recommendations until it’s reviewed by humans. Deciding its first-ever cases, Facebook Incs oversight board ruled on Thursday that the social media company was wrong to remove four of five pieces of content the board reviewed, including posts. More videos may end up getting removed, “including some videos that may not violate policies,” the company writes in a blog post. The board will be compensated an undisclosed amount for their time.acebook in January outlined the board's bylaws, making it clear that the social media giant is still in control. The independent oversight board, which will rule on what is allowed on Facebook’s platforms and whether its policies are fair, will start accepting cases from mid to late October, the people. īecause of the heavier reliance on AI, YouTube basically says we have to expect that some mistakes are going to be made. The board's decisions do not necessarily set any precedents that Facebook has to follow in the future, and the board is limited when it comes to content it can address. This means videos may be taken down from the site purely because they’re flagged by AI as potentially violating a policy, whereas the videos might normally get routed to a human reviewer to confirm that they should be taken down. YouTube will rely more on AI to moderate videos during the coronavirus pandemic, since many of its human reviewers are being sent home to limit the spread of the virus. One Accenture employee told The Intercept that their entire team of over 20 contractors had been told that they were not permitted to work from home to avoid infection. (In Mountain View, a local state of emergency has already been declared over the coronavirus.) The Intercept has seen posts from at least six contractors complaining about not being able to work from home and communicated with two more contractors directly about the matter. In May, we saw the arrival of the first viral hoax of the COVID-19 era: Plandemic, a meandering 26-minute video which. Facebook’s oversight board on Wednesday ruled that Donald Trump’s Facebook account should not be reinstated. The discussions focus on Facebook contractors employed by Accenture and WiPro at facilities in Austin, Texas, and Mountain View, California, including at least two Facebook offices. Discussions from Facebook’s internal employee forum reviewed by The Intercept reveal a state of confusion, fear, and resentment, with many precariously employed hourly contract workers stating that, contrary to statements to them from Facebook, they are barred by their actual employers from working from home, despite the technical feasibility and clear public health benefits of doing so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |